Plus, I wasn't arguing at all.
I asked a question since the server was in the general topic of it because of MissSnik mentioning the phrase 9/11
And that question as repeated for a third time
"It's been 12 years, how is it still too soon?"
I never made ANY mention to arguing with her.
She just ...
Search
Search found 7 matches
- Sun Mar 31, 2013 8:31 pm
- Forum: Complaint Department
- Topic: Banned for "trolling" (Miss-Chevious/Miss Snik)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7741
- Sun Mar 31, 2013 8:28 pm
- Forum: Complaint Department
- Topic: Banned for "trolling" (Miss-Chevious/Miss Snik)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7741
Re: Banned for "trolling" (Miss-Chevious/Miss Snik)
"Bringing up"
>Bringing up
Miss Snik made the mention of 9/11. So she brought it up.
This is a pathetic ban for something she did towards me.
There's a difference between 9/11 and 911
She made the mention of 9/11. Ask anybody in the game at the time. I said 911. She said 9/11 and put words into ...
>Bringing up
Miss Snik made the mention of 9/11. So she brought it up.
This is a pathetic ban for something she did towards me.
There's a difference between 9/11 and 911
She made the mention of 9/11. Ask anybody in the game at the time. I said 911. She said 9/11 and put words into ...
- Sun Mar 31, 2013 8:17 pm
- Forum: Complaint Department
- Topic: Banned for "trolling" (Miss-Chevious/Miss Snik)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7741
Re: Banned for "trolling" (Miss-Chevious/Miss Snik)
Plus, a permanent ban for something that involved ONE THING that was BLAMED on ME
"Flat out disrespectful" is not enough to permanently ban someone. Other people would agree with me on that one. You're just a terrible admin and find pleasure in banning innocent people. Good job.
"Flat out disrespectful" is not enough to permanently ban someone. Other people would agree with me on that one. You're just a terrible admin and find pleasure in banning innocent people. Good job.
- Sun Mar 31, 2013 8:14 pm
- Forum: Complaint Department
- Topic: Banned for "trolling" (Miss-Chevious/Miss Snik)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7741
Re: Banned for "trolling" (Miss-Chevious/Miss Snik)
This wasn't disrespectful at all. It was a question which resulted in you permabanning me.
What you did was disrespectful. You put words into my mouth with the "9/11" thing, so obviously you find pleasure in banning innocent people by 'blaming' them and making them unable to defend yourself.
What you did was disrespectful. You put words into my mouth with the "9/11" thing, so obviously you find pleasure in banning innocent people by 'blaming' them and making them unable to defend yourself.
- Sun Mar 31, 2013 7:50 pm
- Forum: Complaint Department
- Topic: Banned for "trolling" (Miss-Chevious/Miss Snik)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7741
Re: Banned for "trolling" (Miss-Chevious/Miss Snik)
Permanent
It said so in the reasoning too
It said so in the reasoning too
- Sun Mar 31, 2013 7:44 pm
- Forum: Complaint Department
- Topic: Banned for "trolling" (Miss-Chevious/Miss Snik)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7741
- Sun Mar 31, 2013 7:40 pm
- Forum: Complaint Department
- Topic: Banned for "trolling" (Miss-Chevious/Miss Snik)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7741
Banned for "trolling" (Miss-Chevious/Miss Snik)
I'm a somewhat new regular, but a regular nonetheless with this community.
I am aware of all the rules and everything, and I may break them so subtly, but they're given warnings.
I am playing TTT with everybody. One of the traitors was a sniper (Jon somebody) And he was doing bad. Couldn't get ...
I am aware of all the rules and everything, and I may break them so subtly, but they're given warnings.
I am playing TTT with everybody. One of the traitors was a sniper (Jon somebody) And he was doing bad. Couldn't get ...